%/email-for-growth-teams providers ↗
head to head

Mailpit vs MailHog

Active maintenance versus a popular tool that stopped getting updates.

What matters for growth and lifecycle teams

Growth work lives or dies on targeting and measurement. What matters is whether behavioral triggers can be built without engineering time, whether the event stream supports attribution past the open, and whether deliverability holds when broadcast volume shares a reputation with product email.

Priority Mailpit MailHog
Scheduling No No
Event stream No No
Deliverability Not applicable; capture-only. Not applicable; capture-only.
Operating since Not published Not published
Suppressions API No No
Best published rate per 1,000 Tiers not published in comparable form Tiers not published in comparable form
Multi-tenant No No
Free tier Free, MIT-licensed Free, MIT-licensed
Starts at Free Free

For lifecycle and activation work running behavior-triggered journeys, broadcasts, and winback campaigns measured on revenue, the two are level on every priority that can be scored here, so the choice comes down to price and to which product your team would rather operate. On free tier, Mailpit offers Free, MIT-licensed against Free, MIT-licensed from MailHog. That ordering reflects this audience. Weigh the same table differently and the answer changes.

Side by side

Feature Mailpit MailHog
Deliverability Not applicable; capture-only. Not applicable; capture-only.
Multi-tenant No No
Free tier Free, MIT-licensed Free, MIT-licensed
Starts at Free Free
Tagline Modern local SMTP catcher. Classic local SMTP catcher (unmaintained since 2020).
Pricing model self-hosted self-hosted
API Yes Yes
SMTP Yes Yes
SDKs None None
Templates none none
React Email No No
Webhooks No No
Inbound No No
Idempotency No No
Dedicated IP No No
DX score 9/10 5/10
Best for Replacing MailHog in any local or CI email-capture setup. Legacy projects already wired to it.

Mailpit

pros
  • Single Go binary or small Docker image with no runtime dependencies
  • Reuses MailHog's 1025 and 8025 ports, so most existing configs work unchanged
  • Views for rendered HTML, plain text, raw source, headers, and attachments
  • Built-in HTML-compatibility check, link check, and spam-score view
  • REST API and real-time inbox updates for automated tests
cons
  • Local development and staging only, not a production sender
  • No hosted or shared team-inbox mode

MailHog

pros
  • Familiar from years of tutorials and boilerplates
  • Single Go binary with a Docker image and a chaos-testing mode
cons
  • No meaningful releases since 2020
  • HTML and modern CSS rendering trails current email clients
  • Open issues and pull requests are effectively unattended